Comments on: Talk Show Radio Accessibility -Follow-Up Survey- Results http://www.research2000.us/2006/09/27/talk-show-radio-accessibility-follow-up-survey-results/ Your 2010 Election Headquarters Tue, 13 Oct 2009 02:35:55 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9 hourly 1 By: Mean Dean http://www.research2000.us/2006/09/27/talk-show-radio-accessibility-follow-up-survey-results/comment-page-1/#comment-34 Mean Dean Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:49:49 +0000 http://www.research2000.us/2006/09/21/talk-show-radio-accessibility-follow-up-survey-results/#comment-34 Well gee "NoStoppingUs" nice little straw man you got going there. . Sure, if I reduce to absurdity the methodology to "bush sucks" and/or "democrats suck" then I'm sure you're dog will have his day. . But I suspect that considering the depth of political knowledge and respect that Research 2000 is known and oft quoted for (by both dems and repubs), I suspect their questions were a bit more substanitive than your oversimplifications. Well gee “NoStoppingUs” nice little straw man you got going there.
.
Sure, if I reduce to absurdity the methodology to “bush sucks” and/or “democrats suck” then I’m sure you’re dog will have his day.
.
But I suspect that considering the depth of political knowledge and respect that Research 2000 is known and oft quoted for (by both dems and repubs), I suspect their questions were a bit more substanitive than your oversimplifications.

]]> By: NoStoppingUs http://www.research2000.us/2006/09/27/talk-show-radio-accessibility-follow-up-survey-results/comment-page-1/#comment-33 NoStoppingUs Thu, 28 Sep 2006 04:20:45 +0000 http://www.research2000.us/2006/09/21/talk-show-radio-accessibility-follow-up-survey-results/#comment-33 wow. my dog could have done a better 'survey'. first of all, you should have adjusted the number of calls you made to each program depending on how many listeners each had. more listeners = more callers, thus making it quite obvious why it was easier for callers to get on the lesser listened to stations. secondly, your 'dissenting views' could have had a large impact on whether your not you got through. i can call limbaugh 15 times saying 'BUSH SUCKS', and im not going to get on. i can call randi 15 times and say "BUSH SUCKS" (or in this case "DEMOCRATS SUCK") because thats just the type of callers she wants. i'd like the 5 minutes that i spent reading this back please. thanks. wow. my dog could have done a better ’survey’. first of all, you should have adjusted the number of calls you made to each program depending on how many listeners each had. more listeners = more callers, thus making it quite obvious why it was easier for callers to get on the lesser listened to stations. secondly, your ‘dissenting views’ could have had a large impact on whether your not you got through. i can call limbaugh 15 times saying ‘BUSH SUCKS’, and im not going to get on. i can call randi 15 times and say “BUSH SUCKS” (or in this case “DEMOCRATS SUCK”) because thats just the type of callers she wants. i’d like the 5 minutes that i spent reading this back please. thanks.

]]> By: Jerry Mack http://www.research2000.us/2006/09/27/talk-show-radio-accessibility-follow-up-survey-results/comment-page-1/#comment-32 Jerry Mack Wed, 27 Sep 2006 21:46:42 +0000 http://www.research2000.us/2006/09/21/talk-show-radio-accessibility-follow-up-survey-results/#comment-32 Ed Shultz is so accessible because very few people call it. He has less than 1% of Rush Limbaughs listeners. Ed Shultz is so accessible because very few people call it. He has less than 1% of Rush Limbaughs listeners.

]]> By: ricksblog.biz » Tell us something new http://www.research2000.us/2006/09/27/talk-show-radio-accessibility-follow-up-survey-results/comment-page-1/#comment-31 ricksblog.biz » Tell us something new Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:58:23 +0000 http://www.research2000.us/2006/09/21/talk-show-radio-accessibility-follow-up-survey-results/#comment-31 [...] Their findings concluded that all the progressive hosts were more willing to take calls from dissenters than were the conservative hosts. Research 2000’s ranking, in order of accessibility: 1): Shultz, 2) Rhodes, 3) Miller, 4) Ingraham, 5) Limbaugh, and 6) Hannity. Here is the report [...] [...] Their findings concluded that all the progressive hosts were more willing to take calls from dissenters than were the conservative hosts. Research 2000’s ranking, in order of accessibility: 1): Shultz, 2) Rhodes, 3) Miller, 4) Ingraham, 5) Limbaugh, and 6) Hannity. Here is the report [...]

]]> By: Electric-Escape.net http://www.research2000.us/2006/09/27/talk-show-radio-accessibility-follow-up-survey-results/comment-page-1/#comment-30 Electric-Escape.net Tue, 26 Sep 2006 07:00:37 +0000 http://www.research2000.us/2006/09/21/talk-show-radio-accessibility-follow-up-survey-results/#comment-30 <strong>Study: Conservative Radio Hosts Less Accepting of Dissenters than Liberal Hosts...</strong> Is anyone really surprised by this?... Study: Conservative Radio Hosts Less Accepting of Dissenters than Liberal Hosts…

Is anyone really surprised by this?…

]]> By: Radio Talk Show Accessibility Study « My Soap Box http://www.research2000.us/2006/09/27/talk-show-radio-accessibility-follow-up-survey-results/comment-page-1/#comment-29 Radio Talk Show Accessibility Study « My Soap Box Tue, 26 Sep 2006 01:03:49 +0000 http://www.research2000.us/2006/09/21/talk-show-radio-accessibility-follow-up-survey-results/#comment-29 [...] Interesting study. Make of it what you will - Talk Show Radio Accessibility -Follow-Up Survey- Results [...] [...] Interesting study. Make of it what you will – Talk Show Radio Accessibility -Follow-Up Survey- Results [...]

]]> By: Think Progress » Liberal Talk Radio Show Hosts More Accepting Than Conservative Hosts Of Dissenting Points Of View http://www.research2000.us/2006/09/27/talk-show-radio-accessibility-follow-up-survey-results/comment-page-1/#comment-28 Think Progress » Liberal Talk Radio Show Hosts More Accepting Than Conservative Hosts Of Dissenting Points Of View Mon, 25 Sep 2006 23:40:00 +0000 http://www.research2000.us/2006/09/21/talk-show-radio-accessibility-follow-up-survey-results/#comment-28 [...] Their findings concluded that all the progressive hosts were more willing to take calls from dissenters than were the conservative hosts. Research 2000’s ranking, in order of accessibility: 1): Shultz, 2) Rhodes, 3) Miller, 4) Ingraham, 5) Limbaugh, and 6) Hannity. Among the findings: – Progressive host Ed Schultz was the most accessible to callers with opposing points of view. “In fact, the only question the screener asked our fifteen callers was simply where are you calling from, radio call letters and your name.” [...] [...] Their findings concluded that all the progressive hosts were more willing to take calls from dissenters than were the conservative hosts. Research 2000’s ranking, in order of accessibility: 1): Shultz, 2) Rhodes, 3) Miller, 4) Ingraham, 5) Limbaugh, and 6) Hannity. Among the findings: – Progressive host Ed Schultz was the most accessible to callers with opposing points of view. “In fact, the only question the screener asked our fifteen callers was simply where are you calling from, radio call letters and your name.” [...]

]]>